Rotational feedback (polar motion)

A redistribution of surface mass (ice, ocean water) and the resulting solid-Earth deformation change the planet’s inertia tensor, which perturbs the rotation vector — true polar wander (TPW). The shifted rotation in turn alters the centrifugal potential, itself a degree-2 surface load that drives further deformation and sea-level change. FastEarth3D implements this two-way rotational feedback in the time domain, consistent with the explicit memory-stress machinery.

NoteStatus: implemented, on by default

Rotation is implemented (fe_rotation), coupled self-consistently into the sea-level equation, persisted across restarts, and tested against the Spada et al. (2011) polar-motion benchmark (test_rotation, test_rotation_sle). It is on by default (rotation = .true.) for real-Earth runs; the non-rotating community benchmarks set rotation = .false. explicitly.

Formulation

The rotational theory follows the time-domain approach of Martinec and Hagedoorn (2014), which composes with a viscoelastic, 3D-viscosity solver. On the GIA timescale the Chandler wobble is neglected, leaving a quasi-static Liouville equation for the polar-motion vector \(\mathbf{m}\),

\[ \Bigl[\,1 - \tfrac{k^{T}(t)}{k_{s}}\,\Bigr] * \mathbf{m}(t) = \Psi_{L}(t), \qquad \Psi_{L}(t) = \frac{I(t)}{C-A}, \qquad I(t) = \bigl[\delta(t) + k^{L}(t)\bigr] * I_{\rm rigid}(t), \]

where \(*\) is time convolution, \(I_{\rm rigid}\) is the rigid-body inertia perturbation from the surface load, \(k^{L}\) and \(k^{T}\) are the loading and tidal degree-2 Love numbers, \(k_s\) is the secular (fluid-limit) number, and \(C-A\) is the moment difference.

The implementation carries two degree-2 viscoelastic channels on the same per-degree operator — a loading channel forced by the rigid inertia (a direct Gauss-grid quadrature of the load, so no axisymmetry is assumed) and a tidal channel forced by the centrifugal potential. Each carries its own Maxwell memory. The polar motion \(\mathbf{m}\) is solved algebraically each step and is affine in the load, so it sits inside the SLE ↔︎ rotation fixed point safely; the channel memories are committed once with the converged \(\mathbf{m}\).

Coupling through the sea-level equation

The centrifugal potential of the perturbed rotation,

\[ \Lambda = \Omega^{2} a^{2}\,\sin\theta\cos\theta\,(m_1\cos\phi + m_2\sin\phi), \]

is a degree-2, order-1 field. It enters the SLE as the rotational sea-surface contribution \(s_{\rm rot} = (1+k^{T})\Lambda/g - h^{T}\Lambda/g\) (geoid minus uplift), held constant across the SLE solve while the caller iterates the rotation ↔︎ SLE fixed point. The rotational potential is thus treated as a load like any other — self-consistent, not a bolt-on correction.

Design constraints honoured

  • Degree-2, tidal Love numbers. The rotational deformation uses tidal (not loading) Love numbers; the centrifugal forcing is purely degree 2.
  • The secular number \(k_s\). Computing \(k_s\) from the assumed lithosphere thickness leads to the well-known “lithosphere-thickness paradox” in rotational stability; the model can instead pin \(k_s\) to the observed hydrostatic flattening (Mitrovica et al. 2005), recommended for deep time.
  • Couple through the SLE. The rotational potential enters the sea-level equation self-consistently (above).

Validation

The Liouville polar-motion solve is checked against Spada et al. (2011) test 3/2 (Spada et al. 2011) (model fluid \(k_s \approx 0.93\)\(0.94\)), and the rotation ↔︎ SLE per-step fixed point is exercised by test_rotation_sle. See the validation ladder.

TipWhere this lives in the code

fe_rotation holds the two degree-2 channels, the Liouville solve, and the s_rot SLE contribution; fe_coupling drives the rotation ↔︎ SLE fixed point; fe_io persists the polar motion and channel memory on restart. On by default (rotation = .true.); set rotation = .false. for non-rotating benchmarks.

Back to top

References

Martinec, Z., and J. Hagedoorn. 2014. “The Rotational Feedback on Linear-Momentum Balance in Glacial Isostatic Adjustment.” Geophysical Journal International 199 (3): 1823–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu369.
Mitrovica, J. X., J. Wahr, I. Matsuyama, and A. Paulson. 2005. “The Rotational Stability of an Ice-Age Earth.” Geophysical Journal International 161 (2): 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02609.x.
Spada, G., V. R. Barletta, V. Klemann, et al. 2011. “A Benchmark Study for Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Codes.” Geophysical Journal International 185 (1): 106–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.04952.x.